COVER Vs ORIGINAL: A Hazy Shade Of Winter

COVER Vs ORIGINAL: ‘A Hazy Shade Of Winter’

by Hayley Beasley Dye

A Hazy Shade of Winter was originally released by American folk duo Simon & Garfunkel in 1966.

It reached no.30 in the UK charts and no.13 in the US charts. It featured on their Bookends album.

As you’d expect from Simon & Garfunkel their version is a gentle rendition, but still contains the steady rock beat that we hear in the Bangles version. However, it is not a song that one would “rock out” to.

The Bangles version, drops the “A” in the title and reached no.2 in the US and no.11 in the UK. The Bangles recorded their version of the song for the Less Than Zero soundtrack back in 1987. It starts slowly and almost eerily, but soon the familiar beat kicks in.

The tempo is similar to the Simon & Garfunkel version, but has much stronger guitars in it. This creates a much harder-edged rockier version of the song. The vocals sound more choral too as the song features the vocals of all four Bangles.

The most obvious difference between these two versions is that one features female vocals and the other male. So whilst, there are a lot similarities between the two, there is also a very clear distinction.

But, which version is best?

I have a lot time for the Simon & Garfunkel version, but for me the clear winner is the Bangles. I’ll never get bored of this short, sharp, shock version of a fantastic tune.

What do you think? How does this cover version live up to the original?

Take a look at some of the other posts in this series and don’t forget to follow the playlist.


If you enjoy what you read on this site – you can donate to show your support!

Click to donate any amount you like, every little helps!

Don’t have a music streaming service yet? Try one of these:

SpotifyApple Music or Amazon  |

This post contains affiliate links, which means that if you click on one of the product links, I’ll receive commission on any purchases.


  1. Didn’t know there was a Bangles version but… I’m gonna have to give it solidly to Simon and Garf on this one. I can see why people would vibe on the Bangles version but I love how stripped back and simple the original is and I can’t jam with those 80s drums. Fun article, good read!

  2. Always prefer the original S&G version. Having seen this performed live back in the ’80s, this is what also sticks in my mind.

    Have you heard the Disturbed version of Sounds of Silence? Excellent and powerful version, especially with the backing of the video, but alas, I still prefer the original. 😉

    1. Yes I have. It is a fantastic cover! S&G have been covered quite a lot, haven’t they? Understandably, they are great. Wow- you’ve seen live? That’s wonderful!

Leave a Reply to thebeasley Cancel reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s